Quantcast KentNewsNet.com
College Media Network

KentNewsNet.com

Clinic to stop hiring smokers

Abstract:
Nursing students looking for a job after graduation may have to look beyond the Cleveland Clinic - if they smoke. As of Sept. 1, Ohio's second largest employer will no longer hire smokers. All applicants will be tested for nicotine, and the Clinic will offer free smoking cessation programs to prospective employees who smoke....

  • Displaying 1 - 11 of 11

Robin Anderson

posted 7/10/07 @ 10:36 PM EST

Well folks;

The truth hurts, don't it? Smokers have a history of increased chronic/acute illnesses and that's a fact.

The City of Cuyahoga Falls is one municipality that requires new employees to remain "smoke-free" for the duration of their employment with the city...BRAVO! I wonder how many other city or county administrations have instituted similar requirements? I wonder if the same standard apply to the Mayor and his cadre or City Council? I shall have to look into that one, eh?

I wonder why Kent State University continues to hire smokers...hmmm?

Jackie M.

posted 7/11/07 @ 9:50 AM EST

Employees shouldn't be allowed to restrict their employers from partaking in something that is their legal right. Simple as that, Ms. Anderson.

Robin Anderson

posted 7/11/07 @ 5:44 PM EST

Hey, I resemble that remark...I think! Ok, Jackie, it's time to stop watching the reality tv shows and get hooked into reality itself!

Many activities that are "legal" in our society may be carried to such an "addictive" extreme that they harm the individual, incurring enormous costs to the individual and society in general; thus, they are considered to be undesirable character traits deserving to be either corrected or eliminated. You may now stand in awe as I rend apart your superfluous employer/employee argument: although drinking is legal, drinking to extremes has lead to Alcoholics Anonymous; although gambling is legal, losing to extremes at gambling as lead to Gambler's Anonymous; although sex among consenting adults is legal, most "nymphos" would be referred to Sex Anonymous(?); etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. Umm...Jackie...the nicotine in tobacco products is considered to be more addictive than cocaine!

Employers such as Cleveland Clinic and Kent State University offer and/or support many programs to help the individual eliminate or cope with such undesirable character traits in their lives. Um, "Virginia", need I mention that many taxpayer and tuition dollars go into funding such programs???

Now, m'Lady, if you'd like the discussion/debate to be Libertarian vs. Democratic vs. Republican vs. Socialist...that's another story, I think.

Jen

posted 7/12/07 @ 4:51 PM EST

No one is arguing that smoking is a good thing for people to do, Robin; merely that it should not be the deciding factor when hiring. And I'm not sure I follow your argument about other addictions...do you suggest that hiring should be contingent upon the absence of alcohol use, gambling, and promiscuous sex? Where does it end? Should nurses be tested for fast food consumption (if such a thing were possible)? Should they be required to attend the gym? People do unhealthy things, nurses included. These habits (including addictions) should really only be a factor in hiring if the habit prevents the person from satisfactorily performing his/her job.

It would be a wonderful thing if no one smoked, and I hope we eventually see that day...it is an addiction. However, I fail to see how smoking interferes with a nurse's ability to do the job, and I find it frightening that our culture has become so paternalistic.

PS I'm not a smoker, so I'm not saying this out of fear that someone will take my smokes away. :)

Robin Anderson

posted 7/12/07 @ 6:09 PM EST

Originally posted by

Jen

No one is arguing that smoking is a good thing for people to do, Robin; merely that it should not be the deciding factor when hiring. And I'm not sure I follow your argument about other addictions...do you suggest that hiring should be contingent upon the absence of alcohol use, gambling, and promiscuous sex? Where does it end? Should nurses be tested for fast food consumption (if such a thing were possible)? Should they be required to attend the gym? People do unhealthy things, nurses included. These habits (including addictions) should really only be a factor in hiring if the habit prevents the person from satisfactorily performing his/her job.

It would be a wonderful thing if no one smoked, and I hope we eventually see that day...it is an addiction. However, I fail to see how smoking interferes with a nurse's ability to do the job, and I find it frightening that our culture has become so paternalistic.

PS I'm not a smoker, so I'm not saying this out of fear that someone will take my smokes away. :)


Howdy ma'am!

If your "smoking nurse" were totally responsible for any health care costs incurred from his/her habit I would agree with you...everyone, especially an employer, could "butt out"! Ouch!

Ummm...unfortunately, ours is not a libertarian society, m'Lady...no Thoreaus/Walden Ponds here, eh?

rl

JM

posted 7/13/07 @ 11:00 AM EST

Figures you'd be quick to jumping to pulling the "socialist/ libertarian" card.

Robin Anderson

posted 7/13/07 @ 5:20 PM EST

Originally posted by

JM

Figures you'd be quick to jumping to pulling the "socialist/ libertarian" card.


Hello JM, if that's your real name - ha!

Is the "socialist/libertarian card" you seem to denigrate not the crux of this debate? At what point of the societal spectrum do we want our society to fall? The most personal responsibility (Libertarian = less government) or the most governmental responsibility (Socialism = cradle to grave care by the government i.e. socialized medicine) and I couldn't even fathom how a "fascist" government might handle this situation. Ummm, I thought one might substitute "big business" for government in this instance; am I assuming too much? A society is formed by various individuals determining they have common interests. Just as I would seek to aid someone who had never smoked if they were afflicted with lung cancer, I would also seek to aid the poor smuck who smoked cigarettes because they were addicted to nicotine and contracted lung cancer! The question is...just how does our society determine to do this?

Perhaps we need to establish a definition of "Big Brother" first, eh? Or even "societal responsibility". In our capitalistic economic model, a business will always be looking to it's bottom line as it's fiduciary responsibility to it's share holders or owners. They can, however, be made to shoulder more "societal responsibility" due to the fact that they make their profit from our society, but should they be made to shoulder the potential burden of our mistakes?

Things that make me go hmmm.

Vera

posted 7/18/07 @ 10:05 PM EST

I was curious, does anyone know how long nicotine even stays in your blood system to be detected by a test?

Robin Anderson

posted 7/19/07 @ 9:49 PM EST

Originally posted by

Vera

I was curious, does anyone know how long nicotine even stays in your blood system to be detected by a test?


Hello Vera;

I'd offer this bit of easily gleaned research from the online reference, Wikipedia, as an initial response to your question:

Nicotine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pharmacokinetics

As nicotine enters the body, it is distributed quickly through the bloodstream and can cross the blood-brain barrier. On average it takes about seven seconds for the substance to reach the brain when inhaled. The half life of nicotine in the body is around two hours[2]. The amount of nicotine inhaled with tobacco smoke is a fraction of the amount contained in the tobacco leaves (most of the substance is destroyed by the heat). The amount of nicotine absorbed by the body from smoking depends on many factors, including the type of tobacco, whether the smoke is inhaled, and whether a filter is used. For chewing tobacco, dipping tobacco and snuff, which are held in the mouth between the lip and gum, or taken in the nose, the amount released into the body tends to be much greater than smoked tobacco. Nicotine is metabolized in the liver by cytochrome P450 enzymes (mostly CYP2A6, and also by CYP2B6). A major metabolite is cotinine.

Robin Anderson

posted 7/19/07 @ 10:20 PM EST

FYI folks!

It appears that Mayor Robart has placed the City of Cuyhahoga Falls in the avant gard of society's battle against the nefarious cigarette smokers! In response to my direct e-mails, the HRS Departments of Summit County, the City of Akron and the City of Stow informed me that they do not have a "no smoking for the duration of employment" policy.

I'm still waiting to hear from Mayor Robart as to whether or not his direct appointees, any professionals hired and/or any new Councilpersons elected to City Council will have to abide by the same policy his administration has instituted for the City's classified civil servants!

Ummm...a quick internet search also revealed that Medical Mutual "will only hire individuals who do not engage in the use of tobacco."; Turner Broadcasting has a non-smoking hiring policy; Cleveland Clinic has extended it's non-hiring of smokers policy to its holdings in Florida (PalmBeachPost.com).

The Florida site also mentioned that, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 21 percent of adults, or 45 million people, smoke; An estimated $75 billion is spent annually on medical expenses attributed to smoking; Businesses lose $82 bilion in lost productivity from smokers; Smokers take about 6.5 more sick days a year than nonsmokers.

Ta-da!

Robin Anderson

posted 7/28/07 @ 10:39 PM EST

Well folks;

It appears as if "JM" was right...I did jump-the-gun, so to speak but not in my reference to this being a Libertarian/Socialist type of debate. As I've done further research for new information and that which would refresh my memory about the whole issue of the City Cuyahoga Falls non-smoking policy I've discovered that my memory did, indeed, fail me.

The 29 March 2005 article entitled "Mayor snuffs out smoking breaks" that was published in the Falls News-Press reported that "City employees hired after Jan. 1 are no longer allowed to smoke while they are working, said Mayor Don L. Robart. The new policy was instituted by the mayor due to concerns about rising health care costs. The mayor said the move was tied with an earlier decision to reimburse employees who go to the Natatorium a certain number of time a year to work out.

I hope anyone who reads this comment line, especially those of you who cared enough to voice an honest opinion, will forgive me for posting incorrect information in this discussion.
  • Displaying 1 - 11 of 11

Post Your Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What do you think of the service at DeWeese Health Center?
Submit Vote

View Results





Advertisement